Le Sang des Sirènes

Last week I finished Le Sang des Sirènes, a crime / thriller novel by French author Thierry Serfaty. At 250 pages and fairly large typeface, it was a quick read. I completed it over the course of 10 days in my usual evenings and weekends pattern. The book was published in 2000 and the plot is centered around industrial espionage and immunology research (intrigue around the hunt to find and profit from a cure for AIDS). Some combination of the modern publication date, my history working at a pharmaceutical company, and my having read a lot of French crime literature likely explain the fact that nearly all the vocabulary was familiar to me. I noted 24 novel words in the first 100 pages or so and then decided just to finish the book without pencil in hand.

This is Serfarty’s first novel. Although it won that year’s Prix Polar for best crime novel from the Festival Polar de Cognac and launched Serfarty’s successful literary second career as an novelist and television screenwriter (he originally trained as a doctor), I didn’t think much of the book. 

Le Sang des Sirènes starts with an innovative framing. The prologue is a first person narrative where we meet Jan Hellberg, a recently murdered Danish immunologist. He tells us that, as a scientist, he doesn’t believe in reincarnation. Still, the fact remains that he died in a car crash, and then a spirit – named “Life” – came to him and showed him a mysterious hand sabotaging the brakes hours before. So he’s forced to reconsider his views on the hereafter.

Life offers him the chance to relive the last 6 months of his life in order to discover who had arranged his murder. However, he won’t have any power to change the course of events, and he won’t be able to remember the future details of his life as he retraverses those 6 months. He’ll only be able to remember this bargain he’s made with Life, and to pay closer attention to who might have wanted him dead and acted on that motive. Then he can at least die with the solace of knowing who killed him and why.

I really liked the prologue. Witty, introspective, fresh. Unfortunately, everything goes downhill from there. The main character never really gets developed, and the other characters are cardboard at best. There’s an awful lot of telling and not showing. The pacing is erratic, with long science explanations interspersed with breakneck reversals: “person X is good – no wait, they’re evil – just kidding, good after all.” Many of the Dan Brown novels and their emulators (e.g. The Da Vinci Code) suffer from these same flaws, and feel like they are conceived as movies that happen to have been packaged as novels. It doesn’t surprise me that Serfaty went on to write television screenplays. Also, the cellular biochemistry explanations fall wide of the mark. They add nothing for the reader who knows the material, and I can’t imagine they are satisfying or interesting to the reader who hasn’t seen this since high school.

Le Sang de Sirènes had been sitting on my shelf unread for several years. The price printed on the back is «98,00 F TTC» : 98 pre-euro French francs, all taxes included (recall that the Euro was launched in 1999, but existed only as an invisible currency until coins and banknotes appeared in 2002). I purchased it for $1 from the French Cultural Center of Boston at one of their semi-annual book sales. There are no library markings on it, so I conclude that it was a member donation rather than a library de-acquisition. I’m glad to know that the FCC librarians didn’t think this was worth purchasing in the first place. It’s the sort of book one might imagine picking up in an airport before a long flight and being glad of the in-air diversion. Amusingly, I found nestled in the back a boarding pass stub for an Air France flight 062 from Charles de Gaulle airport, Paris, to LAX, Los Angeles. It includes the name of the passenger, but «la pudeur» restrains me from outing them here.

I’m actually being too hard on the book. It was good for reinforcing vocabulary and for practicing automaticity generally. I noticed several words from my previous post on Le Pendu de Saint-Pholien show up in this novel. So I don’t regret starting or finishing the volume. But I won’t be seeking out other works by Serfaty.

One detail remains: how could a book with these flaws win a literary honor like Prix Polar for best crime novel from the Festival Polar de Cognac? For that, I think one needs to understand the French cultural phenomenon of «La rentrée littéraire». Several years ago a teacher shared with me this video from ARTE. It’s worth a watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ4J1oPLkMg

In short, the French seem to love contests and competitions, and there is a tradition of literary prizes that dates back to the start of the 20th century. The earliest and most prestigious of these is the Prix Goncourt, but many others soon followed. Every fall there are a couple of months of closely watched announcements of various books and authors progressing to the next stage for candidate novels for this or that award. The final winners are announced in time to take full advantage of Christmas sales. The winning books are all displayed with red paper bands wrapping them and shouting the name of the award. 

Perhaps more so than in the US (or perhaps not), there’s more than a whiff of theater and self-dealing involved with these awards. The judges are typically authors, and frequently select winners that work with the same publishing houses as themselves. But moreover, the whole thing is as much about marketing as it is about merit. As a result, there is a proliferation of awards and everyone is a winner. In the specific field of crime novels, there are some two dozen annual contests, and many give multiple awards.

In the future, I may trust the recommendations emanating from Cognac more for choosing my brandy than for choosing my reading material.

Here’s the list of unfamiliar vocabulary words I noted:

expression (root)Frequency in 2010
emprunter1 in 23,500
jurer1 in 41,100
chaussé1 in 58,000
arborer1 in 135,000
ronger1 in 142,000
frange1 in 180,000
fléau1 in 199,000
brider1 in 208,000
jalonner1 in 242,000
toiser1 in 279,000
cribler1 in 328,000
rançon1 in 339,000
retrousser1 in 508,000
compatir1 in 517,000
languir1 in 528,000
gabarit1 in 631,000
tonitruant1 in 672,000
hâle1 in 727,000
déboule1 in 767,000
ogive1 in 771,000
carnassier1 in 1,090,000
bâillonner1 in 1,140,000
lésiner1 in 1,340,000
guimbarde1 in 4,460,000
se morfondre1 in 4,980,000

Word Notes

  • une guimbarde is a rare word with multiple meanings. It can denote a musical instrument (a “Jew’s harp”), an old junky car, a 17th-century two-step dance, or a small plane used by a carpenter (a rabot !). In this book, it meant a car. The word frequency was fairly stable in the Google Books corpus at 1 in 20 million from 1800-2000. Then it experienced a sudden jump in between 2003 and 2012, rising to about 1 in 4.5 million, where it has stayed since. Alas, I don’t know which of the meanings has reemerged.
  • lésiner means to skimp or cut corners. It’s been getting steadily more frequent for 200 years. I looked into the possibility that it was connected to the English “lazy”, but the etymologies are completely different.
  • tonitruer is “to thunder”, both in the meteorological sense and in the metaphorical sense of speaking loudly and with anger. Curious that the language has both «tonner» and «tonitruer» with apparently the same meaning. I’m not sure if they carry different connotations.

Common words, uncommon meanings

  • emprunter means “to borrow”, of course, and is routinely a beginner word for the classroom. But it can also mean to take a route or a path to get around: «J’emprunte les escaliers qui mènent à mon bureau.»
  • jurer commonly means to swear, either in the sense of “avow” or in the sense of “curse”. But it can also mean “to clash” or “to conflict”: «l’élément qui jure dans un ensemble harmonieux».
  • la chaussée derives from the word «chaussure», “shoe”. The verb «chausser» means to put shoes on someone or something, like a horse. It can also mean to put tires on a vehicle, which I find a pleasant and consistent evolution of the word. But as a noun, «la chaussée» is a roadway, carriageway, highway, or more generally the pavement. This of course is related to the expression for the ground floor of a building, the «rez-de-chaussée».

Technophile ou technophobe?

This week’s French lesson included an oral comprehension activity pulled from the site Partajon. It features a 6 minute audio clip about attitudes towards technology: love it, hate it, fear it, welcome it (Technophile ou Technophobe?). It’s rated C1, and I had no difficulty understanding the overall arc of the discussion and most of the specifics. When I turned to the accompanying worksheet to test comprehension, I discovered that I had missed a few details like title of a book referenced and some neologisms for new concepts in the intersection between sociology and technology. But on the whole I could listen and understand this clip with «les doigts dans le nez» (a new expression my teacher supplied me today).

I have a knack for remembering English conversation close to verbatim for a short time after I hear it, and it’s always bothered me that my ability to do this in French is pretty much non-existent. I can completely understand what is being said, and I can talk about it confidently afterwards, but I can’t parrot back the exact sentence or use the exact phrase that I heard just a minute or two earlier the way I can in English. But it’s starting to develop bit by bit. And I am getting better at remembering the structure of a wide-ranging radio conversation: what was talked about first, what second, what examples of each point were provided, etc. It feels good.

Vocab list: Le Pendu de Saint-Pholien

I just finished reading George Simenon’s 1931 novel Le Pendu de Saint-Pholien, the fourth adventure of the famous commissaire Maigret. It spans 122 pages in the “Tout Maigret” edition from Omnibus and took me 18 days of occasional bedtime reading to get through. I noted 78 unfamiliar words as I read. I’ve posted them below, with links to definitions from Linguee and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

The novel is only OK, at best. It’s got a murder, two suicides, extortion, forgery, a secret society, assumed identities, and just a soupçon of anti-semitism. Plus, part of it takes place in Germany, so you get Simenon’s impression of that country in 1931 – an interesting time in Franco-Prussian relations. On the whole it’s not much of a mystery, more like a convoluted tale of Bohemian youth gone wild that Maigret happens to stumble upon long after the fact. There’s no sense of danger and little intrigue. But I still have no hesitation about turning the page and diving into the next novel in the tome.

The unfamiliar words are disproportionately about poverty: worn out fabrics, falling apart shoes, cheap suitcases, dilapidated shacks, dirty neighborhoods, ruffian children, low quality merchants. Also a moderate amount of industry: torches, saws, acid baths, printing presses and workshops. There’s a little bit at the other end of the wealth spectrum: flowery scarves, bribed high officials, fancy cars, banking deals, patented systems, savored brandy. And finally there’s a lot of highfalutin descriptions: chiseled features, fleshy limbs, jerky movements, burnished tables, crimson faces and so on.

Here’s the list, sorted by modern word frequency. Recall that the value is estimated by counting all words in all French books Google knows about in the given decade. For comparison, the masculine definite article le occurs with a frequency of 1 in 60, while all the union of all articles (le, la, les, un, une, de, des) taken together account for 1 in 8 words. I don’t have on hand the estimate of what number of distinct French words have a frequency greater than 1 in N, but I’m interested in finding that distribution at some point.

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
bassin1 in 36,7001 in 25,6001 in 24,700
combinaison1 in 47,0001 in 36,4001 in 30,600
maintes1 in 68,4001 in 45,5001 in 37,200
trame1 in 84,5001 in 110,0001 in 144,000
sanguine1 in 99,0001 in 86,6001 in 52,600
revers1 in 105,0001 in 105,0001 in 108,000
ébaucher1 in 126,0001 in 77,5001 in 74,000
friser1 in 159,0001 in 158,0001 in 124,000
sangle1 in 255,0001 in 264,0001 in 239,000
butin1 in 261,0001 in 267,0001 in 262,000
huissier1 in 263,0001 in 176,0001 in 122,000
éparpiller1 in 266,0001 in 391,0001 in 402,000
âpre1 in 277,0001 in 186,0001 in 122,000
morne1 in 287,0001 in 216,0001 in 148,000
hétéroclite1 in 325,0001 in 621,0001 in 901,000
pignon1 in 398,0001 in 386,0001 in 233,000
échevin1 in 416,0001 in 207,0001 in 159,000
saccade1 in 426,0001 in 554,0001 in 465,000
humer1 in 452,0001 in 642,0001 in 607,000
parvis1 in 532,0001 in 820,0001 in 767,000
boyau1 in 576,0001 in 631,0001 in 427,000
breveté1 in 594,0001 in 487,0001 in 294,000
honnir1 in 622,0001 in 1,000,0001 in 924,000
charnu1 in 632,0001 in 508,0001 in 331,000
encastrés1 in 730,0001 in 549,0001 in 427,000
cambrer1 in 749,0001 in 1,210,0001 in 1,070,000
espiègle1 in 753,0001 in 2,000,0001 in 1,640,000
frileux1 in 759,0001 in 1,490,0001 in 1,250,000
fourgon1 in 787,0001 in 1,010,0001 in 907,000
jonc1 in 892,0001 in 589,0001 in 475,000
taudis1 in 906,0001 in 561,0001 in 529,000
chope1 in 927,0001 in 2,730,0001 in 3,080,000
cramoisi1 in 936,0001 in 1,210,0001 in 738,000
fatras1 in 992,0001 in 887,0001 in 757,000
écheveler1 in 1,010,0001 in 1,060,0001 in 977,000
glaise1 in 1,010,0001 in 821,0001 in 728,000
copeaux1 in 1,040,0001 in 706,0001 in 758,000
quincaillerie1 in 1,180,0001 in 738,0001 in 1,470,000
fusain1 in 1,370,0001 in 1,980,0001 in 1,330,000
sommier1 in 1,400,0001 in 988,0001 in 1,060,000
cabanon1 in 1,450,0001 in 3,710,0001 in 3,590,000
camelot1 in 1,450,0001 in 1,190,0001 in 954,000
astiquer1 in 1,690,0001 in 2,260,0001 in 2,880,000
pègre1 in 1,700,0001 in 2,210,0001 in 4,490,000
canif1 in 1,720,0001 in 1,740,0001 in 1,440,000
miteux1 in 1,820,0001 in 3,910,0001 in 8,080,000
brocanteur1 in 1,920,0001 in 2,290,0001 in 1,880,000
échancrer1 in 1,960,0001 in 644,0001 in 373,000
buriner1 in 2,140,0001 in 2,270,0001 in 2,340,000
s’emballer1 in 2,160,0001 in 11,500,0001 in 11,100,000
pelisse1 in 2,170,0001 in 1,680,0001 in 1,070,000
chalumeau1 in 2,190,0001 in 1,030,0001 in 808,000
ventru1 in 2,200,0001 in 1,550,0001 in 1,010,000
grisettes1 in 2,420,0001 in 2,730,0001 in 1,740,000
fadeur1 in 2,450,0001 in 1,330,0001 in 865,000
ramage1 in 2,520,0001 in 1,680,0001 in 1,160,000
lascar1 in 2,560,0001 in 5,810,0001 in 7,400,000
effilocher1 in 2,730,0001 in 3,070,0001 in 3,900,000
genièvre1 in 2,910,0001 in 3,420,0001 in 2,360,000
lutrin1 in 3,440,0001 in 3,600,0001 in 2,600,000
capharnaüm1 in 3,670,0001 in 26,600,0001 in 25,500,000
rabot1 in 3,770,0001 in 1,770,0001 in 2,070,000
papier de soie1 in 4,540,0001 in 6,740,0001 in 3,870,000
s’amorcer1 in 4,640,0001 in 3,180,0001 in 7,530,000
enchevêtré1 in 6,850,0001 in 6,780,0001 in 5,270,000
rapin1 in 7,260,0001 in 4,310,0001 in 2,510,000
lavallière1 in 12,500,0001 in 12,400,0001 in 13,000,000
empeigne1 in 14,500,0001 in 10,800,0001 in 7,260,000
émerillon1 in 17,300,0001 in 15,300,0001 in 14,600,000
varlope1 in 18,800,0001 in 15,300,0001 in 10,500,000
oxhydrique1 in 67,600,0001 in 36,200,0001 in 13,500,000
T.S.F1 in 97,800,0001 in 311,000,0001 in 104,000,000
gueuse-lambicNone1 in 8,600,000,0001 in 2,270,000,000

Word notes

  • lambic is a kind of beer that ferments spontaneously. gueuse-lambic is a mix of old and young lambics – two great tastes that go great together, apparently.
  • une empeigne is the leather upper of a shoe. Turns out there’s a whole lot of parts to a shoe, whose names I don’t know even in English.
  • un varlope and un rabot are two kinds of planing tools for woodworking. I had some trouble understanding from the definitions how they differed, and apparently it’s subtle. I stumbled upon Rabot ou varlope? , which you can consult for details.
  • une grisette is a condescending term for a low-class shop girl or other under-employed young woman who is generally considered sexually available. This character and characterization was fairly well established in French culture, art, and literature for a couple hundred years, including learned debates around what did and did not make one une grisette. Ick.
  • un camelot is a street merchant of cheap manufactured goods. According to Wiktionnaire, the etymology comes from the Arabic word for the animal – “camel”. This is the modern evolution of the itinerant desert trade. I don’t think there’s any connection with King Arthur’s castle. The name Camelot appears in medieval French romances, and there is a Roman ruin named Camuladonum which is thought to be the origin of that.
  • écheveler is to cause something to become disheveled. We need an English word for that. I guess the best we have is “rumple”, though I suppose you can use “dishevel” as an active verb.
  • sanguine is a reddish color, but also a sketch made with a crayon of that color.
A sanguine drawing

Common words, uncommon meanings

  • un bassin means a basin or cistern, but here it was used in the anatomical sense to refer to the collection of bones that make up the pelvis. The Bohemian youth keep a display skeleton around their attic hangout for who knows what reason.
  • une combinaison is a combination in the mathematical, or a coordinated outfit in fashion, but also means a scheme or an arrangement for accomplishing something vaguely shady.
  • la trame is the thread that goes back and forth on a loom – the “woof” in English. It is also used to mean a web of activity going on around someone/something. But in this novel it is used in describing someones clothing, so worn that you could see individual threads.

Amuse-bouches 2020-09-20

There are only 24 hours in a day («On peut pas être au four et au moulin»), and it turns out that every hour I spend writing about my French activities is an hour I don’t spend on doing those activities. Here’s a collection of brief items about French activities I’ve enjoyed recently but haven’t made time to write up until now.

Chagall: Scandale à l’Opéra de Paris

In a recent French lesson I was assigned to watch the short video named «Chagall: Scandale à l’Opéra de Paris». In 1962, artist Marc Chagall was commissioned to create a new painting on the ceiling of the Palais Garnier opera house. I first visited this building in 2013 and absolutely adored it. The main amphitheater is spacious and restful, and the grand staircase in the entryway is stunning. The Chagall ceiling is OK too.

Fred Vargas: Les Evangélistes

Fred Vargas is a well-known French author of detective novels (polar or rompol). She’s been writing since the mid-1980’s and continues to publish new works (I think Quand sort la recluse (2017) is her most recent work). I first came upon her work in 2013 in a Paris bookstore and like it enough to stock up on a bunch of her books that have sat on my shelf unread. When I finished Pietr-le-Letton I needed a next read, and my daughter randomly pulled Vargas’s Sans feu ni lieu from the shelf. It was super accessible (a big change from the Simenon), and I read it in just 10 days or so. It turns out that it’s the final book in a short trilogy, though they are really only loosely linked. So I went back and read the first book Debout les morts, and am now a couple chapters into the middle book, Un peu plus loin sur la droite. For some reason, the first and second books of the series are harder for me to read than the third: maybe her writing style changed, or something else is at work.

The common thread is a household of three historians and an ex-police officer. The historians are named Matthias, Marcus, and Lucien, and the officer christens them St. Matthieu, St. Mark, and St. Luke, or “the evangelists”. In the first book, these four are the primary protagonists and detectives. In the final book, the detective is Louis Kehlweiler, another former police detective who knows evangelists, who themselves appear only briefly. The start of Un plus loin features Kehlweiler again, so I’m expecting the historians will be scarce again. We’ll see.

Mots Fléchés

I enjoy crossword puzzles and am reasonably skilled at them in English. The New York Times daily puzzle only gets interesting for me on Thursday or so. I figured that French crossword puzzles would be a good way to exercise my brain and build vocabulary. That may be true (though crossword puzzle words are their own odd sub-domain), but I completely underestimated how much command of the language is required to do this task. En français, je suis nul en mots fléchés!

The kind of puzzles I’ve been working on are called «mots fléchés». They look something like this

They come rated in levels 0-7. Level 4 is completely beyond me. I took me months to get past level 0, and I’m now working my way through the booklet shown above, labeled level 1-2, which I picked up in a news kiosk in Bordeaux. I feel like I’m about at the point where it is transitioning from level 1 to level 2, and boy am I struggling. In the heart of level 1 I was was able to get through one or two per night reliably without a dictionary, but it would take me well over an hour. Now I’m at an hour or two to get 75% of a puzzle completed. Here’s my current grid:

The answers are all in the back of the booklet, so I’m only as stuck as I let myself be. Often the problem is not that I don’t can’t think of a word to match the clue, but that I just don’t know what the word in the clue means. Here, I think I know what the clue words mean, but perhaps not all the solution words. My knowledge of gourdes is limited, even in English.

You can find lots of print puzzles like this at  https://www.megastar.fr/fleches. If you click into each offering, each title offers a sample puzzle you can download like this, this, or this. They also sell printed booklets individually or by annual subscription. Six issues cost 25€, plus an additional 15€ for mailing to the US. I have enough supply to last me a while, so haven’t tried this yet. You can also play online with, for example, daily new grids at a variety of difficulties from the site Notre temps.

Les Hérietier

The French Cultural Center runs a film club that meets monthly to discuss in French films. I had hoped to attend the September session, which featured the 2014 film Les Heritiers. Not sure how they typically run things when not in the midst of a pandemic, but for this session we were asked to watch the film on our own in advance, then come prepared to discuss it in French. I watched the first 40 minutes of it before learning the Center had to reschedule the meeting for some reason or other. I couldn’t make the new time, so there was no longer any pressure for me to finish the film on time. That was a week ago, not sure if I’ll get back to it. I only understood 2/3 of the dialogue, and I didn’t find it all that engaging.

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 13

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 13 (Les Deux Pietr) with links to definitions from Linguee and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

This chapter is full of dramatic action. First the cliffhanger of the last chapter resolves as Maigret witnesses the Jekyll-Hyde like transformation of the refined, strong Pietr-le-Letton into the crude, weak Fédor Yourovitch. They talk a bit and are briefly interrupted by Le Letton’s wealthy criminal sponsor Mortimer. After he leaves, Maigret realizes that Letton qua Fédor’s mistress Anna is plotting to kill Mortimer from jealousy (recall the revolver in last chapter’s title – Anna wants Fédor to spend more time with her, less time criming). Maigret goes after him, but is too late to prevent the murder. He arrests Anna, but Pietr/Fédor escapes in the confusion.

The chapter spans 6 pages and contained 20 unfamiliar words. The words are mostly about emotional turmoil expressed in the face and body, physical struggle, and garments.

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
surcroît1 in 66,3001 in 125,0001 in 159,000
pan1 in 91,6001 in 133,0001 in 123,000
refouler1 in 109,0001 in 145,0001 in 113,000
pourpre1 in 236,0001 in 191,0001 in 129,000
houle1 in 472,0001 in 340,0001 in 373,000
galon1 in 581,0001 in 543,0001 in 445,000
saupoudré1 in 723,0001 in 1,320,0001 in 818,000
blafard1 in 777,0001 in 967,0001 in 856,000
exsangue1 in 794,0001 in 1,330,0001 in 1,600,000
affaissé1 in 1,210,0001 in 1,040,0001 in 676,000
trépigner1 in 1,220,0001 in 1,750,0001 in 1,620,000
pitre1 in 2,000,0001 in 1,630,0001 in 1,140,000
érailler1 in 2,050,0001 in 4,090,0001 in 3,200,000
pelisse1 in 2,170,0001 in 1,680,0001 in 1,070,000
écoeurant1 in 4,620,0001 in 12,500,0001 in 23,300,000
bonasse1 in 7,060,0001 in 4,710,0001 in 4,530,000
dépoitraillée1 in 20,600,0001 in 22,000,0001 in 18,900,000

Word notes

  • dépoitraillée means “bare-chested” from poitrine. Not only is it the word in this chapter with the lowest modern frequency (and nearly the lowest contemporaneous frequency in the whole book), the word doesn’t show up in Google Books corpus before 1855. Probably a neologism at that point. “A bodice ripper” is a dismissive English description of a sexully explicit romance novel. Maigret isn’t steamy stuff, but Anna’s bodice is indeed ripped as she struggles during her arrest.
  • bonasse is excessively kind. Some translations make it “goody two-shoes”, “meek”, or “naïve”. Simenon uses it to describe Cain in the biblical story of the two brothers.
  • écoeurant is “nauseating” or “revolting”. We saw its infinitive écoeurer back in Chapter 8, so I would normally omit this entry. But a reader pointed out to me that in modern Québecois, this word is generally used to have a positive meaning. This happens in English too: “That fastball was nasty. That was a filthy pitch” or “This cake is wicked.” They shared this helpful video lesson on the Québecois écoeurant with me as well.
  • érailler is “to rub”, “to fray”, “to wear”, “to scuff”, etc. It’s another one of these words that is far more frequent in its past-participle used as an adjective (like crispé and saccadé from last chapter). While normally it means “worn” or “frayed”, it translates better as “hoarse” when describing a voice, which is how Simenon uses it here (une voix trop éraillé). One dictionary translates voix éraillé as “whiskey voice”, which is not an English expression familiar to me.
  • trépigner literally means “to stamp one’s foot with emotion”, but is mostly used metaphorically. A common expression is «trépignent d’impatience», “bursting with impatience”: Vous trépignez d’impatience d’évoluer? It maps to the English animal-based metaphors “chomping at the bit” and “raring to go”. But also somewhat “milling around”: Simenon wrote «les femmes criaient par surcroît, pleuraient ou trépignaient» in describing a scene of hotel guests in the corridor after a the police arrive to investigate a murderous gunshot.
  • blafard and exsangue are near synonyms, both meaning “pale” or “sallow”. Exsangue literally means “without blood” or “with the blood removed”. Curiously, livide also means “pale”, with the connotation of being the result of sickness or strong emotion. In English “livid” is more often heard as a description of extreme anger or rage (“He was livid when he learned his son had gambled away the money.”). But in English the color associated with this word is a dark, gray, bluish, purple (“a livid bruise”). From what I can tell, livide is primarily associated with white in French, but does have a secondary meaning of blue-ish.
  • houle is an ocean swell or a wave. Simenon uses it in the poetic phrase «visage … blafard avec … des yeux couleur de houle». I like that houle is not really a color – it’s the ocean that is colored blue or green or gray – but by using that word the suggestion is that the person is experiencing a forceful swell of emotion, which is covered by the pallor of the rest of the face. Also, the word reminds by of hublot (porthole), though I don’t think the etymologies are connected.

Common words, uncommon meanings

  • pan is a very flexible word. Un pan can mean “a section”, “a panel”, “a flap”, “a facet”, “a part”, “a face (of a mountain)”, “a branch (of a subject)”, “a segment (of a population)”, or “a framing member (in construction)”. Most of these meanings are actually common, but there are so many of them I thought it noteworthy. In this chapter Simenon uses it to describe «un pan de la pelisse», “a flap of the cloak”.
  • pourpre is simply “purple”, and is mostly on this list because Simenon used it as a contrast with exsangue and blafard. I was confused, so I added it to research later. But it’s true that out of context, I was not 100% confident that this was just “purple” and not some idiomatic expression..

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 12

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 12 (La Juive au Revolver) with links to definitions from Linguee and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

In this chapter, Maigret gets a report from an underling about Le Letton’s mistress dining with a gun in her purse, broods about being an underappreciated cop, follows Le Letton around town some more, confronts him in his hotel room, and engineers a bluff to convince him he’s been thwarted. This triggers a sudden personality change in Le Letton (aided by several gulps of whiskey), but then the chapter ends (I wonder how you say “cliffhanger” in French?).

The chapter spans 8 pages and contained 22 unfamiliar words, including a few fairly common ones I’m glad to learn. The words are mostly about pursuing, hurrying, and being in pain.

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
démarche1 in 12,6001 in 30,3001 in 39,300
jurer1 in 41,1001 in 37,5001 in 33,900
nerf1 in 67,6001 in 66,9001 in 34,200
envergure1 in 121,0001 in 162,0001 in 188,000
brusqué1 in 122,0001 in 77,7001 in 44,500
acharner1 in 170,0001 in 153,0001 in 136,000
crispé1 in 172,0001 in 348,0001 in 356,000
péripéties1 in 199,0001 in 204,0001 in 202,000
empressait1 in 310,0001 in 226,0001 in 165,000
voûté1 in 311,0001 in 272,0001 in 242,000
tressaillir1 in 313,0001 in 374,0001 in 249,000
grès1 in 315,0001 in 68,0001 in 54,100
verrou1 in 350,0001 in 498,0001 in 472,000
frêle1 in 351,0001 in 371,0001 in 287,000
saccadé1 in 426,0001 in 554,0001 in 465,000
crouler1 in 749,0001 in 647,0001 in 488,000
guéridon1 in 1,070,0001 in 1,100,0001 in 906,000
envenimer1 in 1,070,0001 in 955,0001 in 854,000
dard1 in 1,260,0001 in 952,0001 in 808,000
inusité1 in 1,300,0001 in 758,0001 in 591,000
califourchon1 in 1,580,0001 in 2,480,0001 in 2,400,000
porte-tambour1 in 69,000,0001 in 159,000,0001 in 363,000,000

Word notes

  • péripéties is “adventures”. I learned the related word périple (“journey”) to describe a car trip I took last January from Paris to Marseille by way of several cities along the western and southern edges of France.
  • envergure is “scale” or “magnitude”. It can be used whether the value is small or large, but is more common with large. Maigret chases des malfaiteurs d’envergure.
  • crispé (“tense” or “uptight”) and saccadé (“jerky”) are past participles that occur as adjectives far more than as verbs. Crisper and saccader do exist, though.
  • verrou is “a lock”, “a latch”, or “a bolt”. But the expression sous les verrous is used for jailed persons, akin to “under lock and key” or “behind bars”.
  • envenimer means “to poison” or “to aggravate”. But reflexively, s’envenimer means “to fester”.
  • inusité means “unusual”. It was less unusual to see it in 1930.
  • califourchon is “straddling”, to describe a way of sitting on a saddle or on a chair. But acces à califourchon means “piggybacking” or “tailgating”, meaning a second person sneaking in without payment or authorization behind a legitimate entrant.
  • porte-tambour is a revolving door, or literally a “drum door”. The door itself was invented in 1888 for use in skyscrapers. The French name for it underwent a mild shift over time. Even in 1930, it was more common to write porte à tambour; dropping the hyphen was less common. But around 2000 the gap between these formulations became far sharper (see graph), and now porte à tambour seems standard. Note the stated frequency of 1 in 69 million is not comparable the other words in this list because it concerns a multi-word phrase; NGram Viewer handles phrases differently from single words.

Common words, uncommon meanings

  • jurer typically means “to swear” or “to curse”, which I knew. But in the expression jurer dans it means “to clash with”: C’était un sac de voyage vulgaire, qui valait tout au plus une centaine de francs et qui jurait dans ce décor.
  • une démarche usually means an “action” or an “undertaking”, but it can also mean “gait”, i.e. the way someone walks. The word is quite common, but wasn’t familiar to me in any of its meanings.

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 11

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 11 (La Journée des Allées et Venues) with links to definitions from Linguee and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

In this chapter, Maigret first rails internally against the aloof, polished, Nordic, hyper-intellectual Letton qua Oppenheim, then openly follows him about town a bit. As they approach a bar, he witnesses a remarkable transformation: Oppenheim slips away and is replaced by the rough, ignorant slav Fédor Yourovitch. It dawns on Maigret that these are not simple aliases or disguises, but actual personality shifts that Letton can little control. Eventually, Letton manages to return to his Oppenheim persona, with a crushed whiskey glass and a cut hand in the picture. There’s something blatantly Jekyll and Hyde about the whole thing, with a none too charitable treatment of dissociative personality disorder.

All in all there are 8 pages, 23 unfamiliar words. Mostly about transformations, internal and external features, coming undone, bars, and smells:

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
racé1 in 30,8001 in 24,5001 in 13,400
briller1 in 37,7001 in 38,5001 in 31,200
abattre1 in 52,4001 in 46,6001 in 51,300
brouiller1 in 83,3001 in 126,0001 in 121,000
trempe1 in 102,0001 in 91,9001 in 80,500
étreindre1 in 105,0001 in 174,0001 in 139,000
coupure1 in 107,0001 in 103,0001 in 138,000
rôder1 in 217,0001 in 276,0001 in 256,000
broyer1 in 250,0001 in 210,0001 in 172,000
écailler1 in 254,0001 in 126,0001 in 99,900
travestir1 in 294,0001 in 384,0001 in 495,000
rebords1 in 302,0001 in 213,0001 in 199,000
truchement1 in 306,0001 in 338,0001 in 1,110,000
renifler1 in 403,0001 in 977,0001 in 1,500,000
décousu1 in 427,0001 in 686,0001 in 707,000
désinvolture1 in 436,0001 in 501,0001 in 632,000
humer1 in 452,0001 in 642,0001 in 607,000
forcené1 in 493,0001 in 530,0001 in 535,000
relent1 in 547,0001 in 934,0001 in 1,350,000
disséquer1 in 583,0001 in 486,0001 in 452,000
exigu1 in 595,0001 in 675,0001 in 685,000
grime1 in 2,230,0001 in 3,960,0001 in 3,110,000
encaisseur1 in 17,500,0001 in 7,940,0001 in 5,940,000

Word notes

  • exigu is my favorite of this bunch. It means “cramped” or “small”. It is not “cozy” or anything positive. I like the word because it fits three syllables into the tight space of just five letters, somehow embodying its own meaning.
  • décousu is the past participle of découdre, which is the opposite of coudre = “to sew”. Décousu is translated as “disjointed” or “rambling”, but literally means something more like “unhitched” or “unraveled”, maybe “frayed”.
  • désinvolture (“casualness”) is the noun form of the word désinvolte (“casual”) we saw in Chapter 10.
  • racé meaning “distinguished” is not really all that common. Google NGram Viewer is conflating with with race meaning race.

Common words, uncommon meanings

  • une coupure de cinq francs: the word coupure just means “a cut”, but here it is used to mean a denomination of currency. Could just as well have used un billet. My research found this sense of coupure being used these days more often in technical monetary discussions.
  • par le truchement de: the word truchement means “intermediary”. But this entire phrase is universally translated as “through”. For example, Les organisations ne peuvent agir que par le truchement de leurs employés ou de leurs agents. = “Corporations can only act through their employees and agents.” But note what happened – the entire prepositional phrase in French gets reduced to just the preposition in English. You see this again and again in the sample of occurrences of truchment on Linguee. I find this remarkable; I don’t know other examples where a noun (as opposed to an interjection or an adverb) is universally dropped in the translation from French to English.
  • un encaisseur de la Compagnie du gaz. By itself, the word encaisseur means “a collector” or “a cashier”. But here, it’s used to describe another patron sitting at the bar. How does Maigret know that’s his job? Was he actively working there? Did folks pay their gas bills not at the office, but at a bar? Fun to spin imaginative tales of how the 1930’s worked. As the word is now one in 17 million, it’s easy to dream up a way of life that has now vanished.
  • fer à cheval is literally “iron on a horse” but more properly horseshoe. Here it’s used in the phrase le bar à fer en cheval = “a horseshoe shaped bar”.
  • grime = “dirt” or “grime”. But by far the most common usage of this word is in the form se grime = “to paint one’s face” or “to make up”. Simenon uses it in the discussion of cops disguising themselves when undercover, while Pietr-le-Letton actually became these persona on the inside. The phrase also appears in the title of a famous print by Georges Rouault created in 1923, “Qui ne se grime pas?”.
This verb form, “se grime”, is by far more common than any other word preceding “grime”.
“Qui ne se grime pas?” a print by Georges Rouault created in 1923.
  • abattre ses cartes = “lay one’s cards on the table”. Abattre is “to slaughter”, and abattu can mean “killed”, or “felled” / “hewn” / “cut down”. More metaphorically, it can mean “depressed” or “down”. An abat-jour is a lampshade – it kills the daylight. So abattre ses cartes is to let the cards fall from your hand face up, revealing what was hidden. And of course un abattoir is “a slaughterhouse”, like this one I photographed 2018 in Roye, France, just casually plunked down a quarter mile from the old center of town:

I’m oddly curious about these cars parked outside the slaughterhouse. Were they there to purchase meat? Do they work there? Did they bring with them chickens, or very cooperative pigs to be butchered? Seems too grim for the cheerful shade of yellow paint.

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 10

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 10 (Le Retour d’Oswald Oppenheim) with links to definitions and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

In this chapter there’s not much action, more internal brooding and some reveals. Maigret mourns at his desk, goes back to the tenement on rue du Roi-de-Sicile to confront the woman he interviewed there before, then returns to the hotel to fume as he sits in the lobby. He envisions the body of his dead colleague being taken out of the hotel on a stretcher through the service corridors. He pieces together the fact that his quarry, the villain Pietr-le-Letton, is the same man who plays the role of the elegant Oswald Oppenheim, and also the same man passing as Fédor Yourovitch, the immigrant husband of tenement woman. The chapter ends with him realizing he has no proof of all this as he watches Letton qua Oppenheim enter the hotel lobby resplendent in his finery.

A short-ish chapter, just 16 unfamiliar words. About half of them are interior decorating words as Maigret spends most of these pages sitting in and thinking about the hotel:

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
remuer1 in 99,6001 in 95,9001 in 73,800
cogner1 in 209,0001 in 397,0001 in 530,000
mat1 in 260,0001 in 210,0001 in 176,000
chapelet1 in 320,0001 in 337,0001 in 248,000
malle1 in 357,0001 in 372,0001 in 264,000
désemparé1 in 374,0001 in 595,0001 in 593,000
haleter1 in 484,0001 in 597,0001 in 537,000
désinvolte1 in 540,0001 in 880,0001 in 1,660,000
osier1 in 647,0001 in 766,0001 in 585,000
clairsemé1 in 988,0001 in 699,0001 in 459,000
vasque1 in 1,100,0001 in 999,0001 in 873,000
civière1 in 1,240,0001 in 1,760,0001 in 1,820,000
limoger1 in 1,430,0001 in 2,880,0001 in 10,700,000
rotin1 in 1,780,0001 in 1,720,0001 in 1,890,000
colimaçon1 in 1,870,0001 in 3,080,0001 in 3,520,000
râblé1 in 4,730,0001 in 6,050,0001 in 5,300,000

A few thoughts I had while looking up these words:

  • limoger means “to fire someone” or “to sack”. This word was virtually unheard of in 1900, and has had a steady rise since, peeking right around 2000. Simenon seems to have caught this wave as it was building.
  • râblé is typically translated as “stocky”. Both words are used almost exclusively in descriptions of people or animals, and it’s not obvious what other words in the language they are related to. Both words were nearly unused in their language before 1800. The word râble (without the accent over the final e ) means “back” or “saddle”, and occurs most often as describing an edible part of a rabbit: râble de lapin, râble de lièvre. Sounds tasty, from the recipe descriptions.
  • colimaçon is a spiral staircase. Good word, that. The architectural feature has been around since about 150 A.D., and the word colimaçon came into broad use around 1760 and held remarkably steady for 240 years. Since 2000, though, it’s usage has shot up inexplicably. I wonder what spiral staircases everyone is talking about suddenly?
  • osier and rotin both describe chairs. osier is “wicker” while rotin is “rattan”. I realized I didn’t know what the difference between these was in English, so I looked it up. Apparently “wicker” is the woven construction method while “rattan” is the fibrous vine that is used as material for weaving. Not sure why Simenon used both in the same chapter. Most people use them interchangeably in English, and apparently in French too, with osier being about three times more popular a word choice:
  • mat is more commonly used as a noun, a synonym for tapis or carpet (i.e. a mat). But here Simenon uses it to describe the sound of somebody spitting down a stairwell at Maigret: “La salive tomba avec un bruit mat …”. The dictionary says “flat” is the translation of this use of mat (like a matte finish of a painted wall or a photograph), but if I were translating this I would not say “with a flat noise” I would write “The saliva fell with a splat …”
  • clairsemé means “sparse”. Another good word to know. Simenon uses it in this short sentence describing the hotel lobby late at night: “Des domestiques clairsemés circulaient.” In my professional life, I often work with matrices: two-dimensional grids of numbers used to represent all sort of things. Calculations with matrices are a lot easier of most of the numbers in them are 0, and there’s a special name for these: “sparse matrices”. Alas, the accepted French term for “sparse matrix” seems to be matrice creuse, and not matrice clairsemé, though you will find this phrase in bad translations.

Onward to Chapter 11 !

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 9

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 9 (Le Tueur) with links to definitions and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer.

In this chapter, Maigret goes hunting for the shooter who winged him in Chapter 7. Maigret doesn’t find the shooter, but does identify the spotter who pointed out Maigret as the target. He visits the spotters apartement, finds it empty, searches it.

My list of unfamiliar words in this chapter is pretty short. Mostly about the random stuff Maigret finds in the ratty apartment of a vaguely unsavory male nightclub dancer:

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
instar1 in 50,4001 in 222,0001 in 315,000
mondain1 in 103,0001 in 124,0001 in 107,000
broncher1 in 329,0001 in 365,0001 in 235,000
comparse1 in 794,0001 in 970,0001 in 953,000
délester1 in 843,0001 in 2,530,0001 in 3,660,000
escarpin1 in 1,110,0001 in 3,870,0001 in 3,550,000
rapiécer1 in 1,960,0001 in 2,670,0001 in 2,440,000
perdreau1 in 2,840,0001 in 2,430,0001 in 1,580,000
frusques1 in 7,120,0001 in 9,390,0001 in 11,300,000
reps1 in 19,800,0001 in 9,740,0001 in 7,090,000
véronal1 in 45,400,0001 in 5,070,0001 in 3,730,000

A few thoughts I had while looking up these words:

  • reps here means a coarse weave in fabric, usually for upholstery. Also used to describe wire mesh.
  • rapiécer (“to patch up”) uses the prefix ra- to mean “again”. This is also the case in an earlier word from this novel, raviser. I hadn’t known this existed, as opposed to the more common re- prefix. I wonder if there’s a pattern of when each one is used. 
  • comparse means “sidekick”, “accomplice”, or “buddy”, but with a less-than-savory connotation. In researching its usage I’ve sometimes seen it translated as “stooge”, which I really liked and fit the situation perfectly: l’Union européenne ne parvenait à prendre une initiative et à jouer un rôle autre que de comparse des États-Unis, évidemment.
  • The rarest word, véronal, is a sedative drug. Indeed, it was the first commercially available barbiturate, invented in 1903 by a German chemist working in Verona, Italy, and marketed under the name Véronale. The drug became common enough that the brand name turned into a common word. Its frequency in the Google Books corpus jumped when it was invented, grew during the 1930s, peeked around 1938, had a brief resurgence in the 1950s, then faded to near nothingness by 1985 or so. I bet commercial sales followed a similar pattern
The lifecycle of a commercial drug? Véronale came and went.
  • The word délester means “to offload”, “to relieve congestion”, or “to outsource”. It’s had a steady growth over 100 years. Simenon was reaching for an obscure, one-in-3.6 million word when he penned it. Now the word is more common jargon:
Pretty soon all French jobs will be outsourced…
  • The word instar is used almost exclusively in the phrase à l’instar de qqch, an expression that draws a similarity between two things or situations. I had not known this expression, but it’s fairly common today at 1-in-50,000 words. Here are some recent examples from Linguée:
    • Ici, à l’instar d’autres aspects des soins de santé, les gouvernements canadiens ont adopté deux stratégies.
    • À l’instar des années précédentes, la fourniture des statistiques s’est déroulée normalement en 2003.
    • À l’instar de plusieurs artistes de l’époque, il doit travailler fort et même se battre pour imposer ses idées nouvelles.
Est-ce que tout le monde veut être à l’instar de la majorité?

When Simenon used the phrase in 1931, it was leading a boring life, with a stable frequency over decades. Something happened in 1970 that launched this expression on a steady upward trajectory that took 40 years to peak in the 2000s, but had been pretty steadily declining since then. Did “group think” become a thing starting in 1970, and everybody had to showcase how their situations / actions / outcomes were universal? In the words of songwriter Jim Infantino, “Everybody’s trying not to be just like everybody, and I don’t want to be like that.”

Vocab list: Pietr-le-Letton, Chapter 8

I’m making lists of unfamiliar words as I read George Simenon’s 1931 Pietr-le-Letton, the novel debut of the famous commissaire Maigret. Here’s my list for Chapter 8 (Maigret Ne Joue Plus) with links to definitions and word frequencies from Google Books NGram Viewer (warning: today’s frequency counts are wonky).

In this chapter, Maigret has been shot! Actually, that happened at the end of chapter 7, but I was unclear on the fact; all I had gleaned was that someone was shot in the final sentence of chapter 7, I hadn’t realized it was Maigret. In Chapter 8 he first spends a while stumbling around bleeding, then he makes his way back to the hotel where his officers were staking out the criminals, only to find one of them murdered via chloroform and a long needle to the heart. Finally, he calls in his Chief of Police, cleans himself up, and heads into the field once more to find the bad guys, ‘cuz now it’s personal!

Today’s list is largely words about wounds, bandages, nausea, blood stains, swelling, and lassitude. You know, everyday vocabulary.

expression (root)Frequency in 2010Frequency in 1970Frequency in 1930
fouler1 in 20,4001 in 21,2001 in 17,800
allure1 in 47,6001 in 45,8001 in 33,100
ballant1 in 50,2001 in 66,4001 in 61,300
desservir1 in 74,6001 in 85,9001 in 71,800
plaie1 in 94,5001 in 109,0001 in 67,300
caler1 in 143,0001 in 190,0001 in 161,000
gisait1 in 156,0001 in 194,0001 in 172,000
frôler1 in 183,0001 in 351,0001 in 391,000
béant1 in 226,0001 in 352,0001 in 317,000
dénicher1 in 278,0001 in 1,050,0001 in 1,070,000
pansement1 in 347,0001 in 567,0001 in 260,000
netteté1 in 361,0001 in 157,0001 in 100,000
recroquevillé1 in 404,0001 in 1,110,0001 in 1,610,000
happer1 in 420,0001 in 787,0001 in 811,000
souillure1 in 423,0001 in 501,0001 in 460,000
ahurissant1 in 445,0001 in 596,0001 in 576,000
raviser1 in 531,0001 in 1,130,0001 in 1,010,000
poindre1 in 628,0001 in 814,0001 in 729,000
bourrelet1 in 978,0001 in 259,0001 in 186,000
omoplate1 in 1,080,0001 in 1,350,0001 in 653,000
bougonner1 in 1,130,0001 in 2,310,0001 in 2,450,000
divaguer1 in 1,140,0001 in 1,680,0001 in 1,640,000
boursouflé1 in 1,430,0001 in 1,560,0001 in 1,350,000
tuméfier1 in 1,740,0001 in 2,810,0001 in 981,000
hébétude1 in 2,130,0001 in 3,010,0001 in 3,610,000
tournemain1 in 4,290,0001 in 5,130,0001 in 4,040,000
écoeurer1 in 5,780,0001 in 16,500,0001 in 35,900,000
écoeurement1 in 25,800,0001 in 50,200,0001 in 110,000,000

A few notable things today:

  • The word gisait means “was lying”, as in a dead body sprawled out on the floor. It’s commonly used for bodies, dead or alive, lying on surfaces. But the interesting thing is the infinitive is gésir, but all the conjugations start with gis-. Apparently it is also used only in restricted tenses: présent indicative, imparfait indicative, and present participle. I’ve never encountered this pattern before.
  • The word une plaie means a wound. The frequency of this words usage in books is fascinating:
The word “une plaie” means “a wound”. Any guesses what happened from 1914 – 1918 to cause this spike in usage of the word “plaie” in French books?
  • That spike around 1916? That’s the First World War. I don’t know why there isn’t a similar spike during World War II. All the wounded soldiers died, so the wounds weren’t worth writing about? A different word was adopted to describe these wounds? Nobody had time to write about it? Or maybe these books are just not in Google’s data for some reason.
  • The word écoeurement (disgust, nausea) is the rarest on this list — a whopping 1 in 26 million these days. But it’s not that hard to find on the Web, so I wonder if it’s just not a bookish word? Note that the word is having a resurgence. When Simenon selected it, the word has a prevalence in print of just 1 in 110 million !
  • Google NGram Viewer released a new corpus this week, with data running all the way up to 2019. So I shifted my window to look at the years 1930, 1970, and 2010. Recall the book was written in 1931, so the 1930 data is the environment Simenon was writing in.
  • That said, the frequencies are not entirely trustworthy at the moment. I think the new release does very aggressive pooling. So for example, ballant (dangling) is broken by its conflation with balle (a ball). I’m sure the “dangling” meaning is more rare than 1 in 50,000 words. I’ll work to get these cleaned up before long, but meanwhile I don’t trust the frequencies more common than 1 in 100,000